[151317] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shared address space... a reality!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Mar 15 17:05:13 2012
To: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT."
<CAK__Kzv92Wgf0hUHq=nKjnUpp=-nTdpq4_fxJdfQs2J4e+_5tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:03:46 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1331845426_2149P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 PDT, George Herbert said:
> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
> home before they test it at work is bad?
Either that, or Randy was being snarky about how long the promise to *only* use
the address space for numbering CGN interfaces and not as additional RFC1918
space was going to last in reality....
--==_Exmh_1331845426_2149P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=AxUD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1331845426_2149P--
