[151316] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shared address space... a reality!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert E. Seastrom)
Thu Mar 15 16:58:39 2012
To: George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com>
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:57:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAK__Kzv92Wgf0hUHq=nKjnUpp=-nTdpq4_fxJdfQs2J4e+_5tw@mail.gmail.com> (George
Herbert's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:35:13 -0700")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
More like "wasting no time in fulfilling the prophesy that people will
treat it like just another rfc1918 space and deploy it wherever they want".
not that randy is likely to get bitten because he's not behind a cgn
nor is he planning to be, but still, that took all of what, 72 hours?
-r
George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com> writes:
> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space at
> home before they test it at work is bad?
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Jérôme Nicolle <jerome@ceriz.fr> wrote:
>> Le 15/03/12 07:59, Randy Bush a écrit :
>>> and i have configured two home LANs to use it
>>
>> Sooooo wrong...
>>
>> --
>> Jérôme Nicolle
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert@gmail.com
