[151318] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shared address space... a reality!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Thu Mar 15 17:09:13 2012
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <86vcm5y43b.fsf@seastrom.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:08:01 -0500
To: NANOG Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm sure it happened much sooner than 72 hours post allocation. In fact, =
there were probably folks already squatting on that space long before =
any of this. Maybe their life just got a little easier. :)
Cheers,
-Benson
On Mar 15, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>=20
> More like "wasting no time in fulfilling the prophesy that people will
> treat it like just another rfc1918 space and deploy it wherever they =
want".
>=20
> not that randy is likely to get bitten because he's not behind a cgn
> nor is he planning to be, but still, that took all of what, 72 hours?
>=20
> -r
>=20
> George Herbert <george.herbert@gmail.com> writes:
>=20
>> What, senior network people testing out new test/transitional space =
at
>> home before they test it at work is bad?
>>=20
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:26 AM, J=E9r=F4me Nicolle <jerome@ceriz.fr> =
wrote:
>>> Le 15/03/12 07:59, Randy Bush a =E9crit :
>>>> and i have configured two home LANs to use it
>>>=20
>>> Sooooo wrong...
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> J=E9r=F4me Nicolle
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> --=20
>> -george william herbert
>> george.herbert@gmail.com
>=20
