[151232] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Ridder)
Tue Mar 13 21:10:38 2012
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203132033250.21342@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:09:37 -0500
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
To: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
4 of the 6 downstreams are multihomed. Only 40321 (Emigrant Bank) and 18762
(Dominick & Dominick LLC) are single homed to 19262 (Verizon Online LLC).
-Grant
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Justin M. Streiner <streiner@cluebyfour.org
> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> A) DHCP only, single address, dynamic
>> B) Single Static address (uplift of 25$/month I believe?)
>>
>
> I think that might be $40/mo now, but I could be mistaken.
>
>
> Also, I know that on 701 the rate of BGP to non-BGP customers was
>> increasing and was at ~30% or so as of ~2007... You'd think that 19262
>> would see that, see the business opportunity and offer it? Though, I
>> suppose they DO see the business opportunity: "You want bgp? you want
>> to bring your own ips? you want more than a DHCP address? Pay up, a
>> lot."
>>
>
> I wonder if something is cooking there. When I look at a full BGP view, I
> see quite a few ASNs downstream of 19262, beyond some that appear to be
> internal VZ ASNs:
>
> * 12.195.9.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 30079
> * 65.198.73.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 40321
> * 68.236.226.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 18762
> * 137.71.229.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 20258
> * 141.155.220.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 36512
> * 143.165.216.0/21 x.x.x.x 701 19262 2923
> .....
>
> jms
>
>
