[151231] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin M. Streiner)
Tue Mar 13 20:44:04 2012
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:43:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYYbLVLTD7bbKKuQSQkznhO6w_77V3OrAkNb3hxndw8Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> A) DHCP only, single address, dynamic
> B) Single Static address (uplift of 25$/month I believe?)
I think that might be $40/mo now, but I could be mistaken.
> Also, I know that on 701 the rate of BGP to non-BGP customers was
> increasing and was at ~30% or so as of ~2007... You'd think that 19262
> would see that, see the business opportunity and offer it? Though, I
> suppose they DO see the business opportunity: "You want bgp? you want
> to bring your own ips? you want more than a DHCP address? Pay up, a
> lot."
I wonder if something is cooking there. When I look at a full BGP view, I
see quite a few ASNs downstream of 19262, beyond some that appear to be
internal VZ ASNs:
* 12.195.9.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 30079
* 65.198.73.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 40321
* 68.236.226.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 18762
* 137.71.229.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 20258
* 141.155.220.0/24 x.x.x.x 701 19262 36512
* 143.165.216.0/21 x.x.x.x 701 19262 2923
.....
jms
