[150933] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric)
Thu Mar 8 08:21:36 2012
In-Reply-To: <4F57FF51.6060205@rancid.berkeley.edu>
From: Eric <eric@roxanne.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:02:48 -0500
To: Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
+1
- Eric
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu> wr=
ote:
> On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
>>=20
>>> As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we'r=
e trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of t=
hese little events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we're giving the facts a=
s they are known from initial measurement, and a very quick summary of our p=
reliminary analysis of the incident. Then we throw the topic open to comme=
nts from those who might have the clues to the rest of the story ...
>>=20
>> Well, this member of the community appreciates it.
>>=20
>=20
> +1
>=20
> I find the combination of facts and inferences presented to be interesting=
and useful.
>=20
> michael
