[150922] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Sinatra)
Wed Mar 7 19:38:39 2012
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:37:37 -0800
From: Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <E19B1D58-851E-49C3-9CFC-17EE03C55464@ianai.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
>
>> As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we're trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of these little events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we're giving the facts as they are known from initial measurement, and a very quick summary of our preliminary analysis of the incident. Then we throw the topic open to comments from those who might have the clues to the rest of the story ...
>
> Well, this member of the community appreciates it.
>
+1
I find the combination of facts and inferences presented to be
interesting and useful.
michael
