[150912] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Cowie)
Wed Mar 7 17:35:51 2012
In-Reply-To: <AF24AE2D4A4D334FB9B667985E2AE76327BBF85D@mail1-sea.office.spectrumnet.us>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:34:44 -0500
From: Jim Cowie <cowie@renesys.com>
To: John van Oppen <jvanoppen@spectrumnet.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen@spectrumnet.us>wrote:
> All -
>
> I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from
> cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know
> anything about this? We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic away
> from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cogent's path is
> _174_1239_4134_.
>
>
Indeed:
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml
cheers, --jim
