|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch> To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> In-Reply-To: <AAF7587C-6F54-4791-824F-1014192C7680@apnic.net> (Geoff Huston's message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:25:58 +1100") Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:57 +0200 Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Geoff Huston writes: > Does anyone give a s**t about this any more? I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list (doesn't happen frequently; more often for the BGP updates report than for CIDR), I may send them a note and ask what happened. > From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody > reads this any more. "Reads" may be an exaggeration, but I'm sure some look at it. > Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with > this report? I think it still provides an incentive for people not to mess things up too badly; and a chance of some mishaps to be noticed quicker, with a little help from your friends. -- Simon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |