[145683] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Sat Oct 15 17:26:28 2011
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:26:17 +0200 (IST)
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@efes.iucc.ac.il>
To: Simon Leinen <simon.leinen@switch.ch>
In-Reply-To: <aar52eotoa.fsf@macsl.switch.ch>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Simon Leinen wrote:
Ditto here.
-Hank
> Geoff Huston writes:
>> Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
>
> I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top
> offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list
> (doesn't happen frequently; more often for the BGP updates report than
> for CIDR), I may send them a note and ask what happened.
>
>> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
>> reads this any more.
>
> "Reads" may be an exaggeration, but I'm sure some look at it.
>
>> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with
>> this report?
>
> I think it still provides an incentive for people not to mess things up
> too badly; and a chance of some mishaps to be noticed quicker, with a
> little help from your friends.
>
