[144588] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Wed Sep 14 16:41:22 2011
In-Reply-To: <4E70CFF9.8050505@otd.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:40:13 -0500
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: David Israel <davei@otd.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM, David Israel <davei@otd.com> wrote:
> On 9/14/2011 10:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>
>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>>>>
>>> Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
>>>
>>>
>> Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
>>
>>
> That's disingenuous. The question was not whether Cisco has ever lied, but
> whether the web page lies. The web page very carefully picks and chooses
> facts, but I don't think it actually lies. Therefore, it isn't slander.
> It's just mudslinging.
>
> Also, on another note, nobody should be surprised that the registration
> information doesn't say "Cisco." Think about it: would they want "whois
> overpromisesunderdelivers.com" to say "Cisco" all over it?
>
>
Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're
gear just works.
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
