[144584] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Israel)
Wed Sep 14 12:03:25 2011
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:02:01 -0400
From: David Israel <davei@otd.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643BF621@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
X-otd-MailScanner-From: davei@otd.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/14/2011 10:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>> Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
>>
>
> Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
>
That's disingenuous. The question was not whether Cisco has ever lied,
but whether the web page lies. The web page very carefully picks and
chooses facts, but I don't think it actually lies. Therefore, it isn't
slander. It's just mudslinging.
Also, on another note, nobody should be surprised that the registration
information doesn't say "Cisco." Think about it: would they want "whois
overpromisesunderdelivers.com" to say "Cisco" all over it?
