[144632] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Morris)
Thu Sep 15 21:03:19 2011
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:02:10 -0400
From: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7033AC21-3074-4541-8D5C-B37E7AF57201@freedomnet.co.nz>
Reply-To: swm@emanon.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Now just where would the fun in THAT be? ;)
Scott
On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote:
> Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Always Learning [mailto:nanog@u61.u22.net]
>>> Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39
>>> To: N. Max Pierson
>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Subject: Re: ouch..
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>>> Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards,
>>>
>>> Paul.
>>> England,
>>> EU.
>>
>> Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
>>
>> --
>> Leigh
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
>
