[144267] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Roesen)
Wed Sep 7 12:37:39 2011
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:36:56 +0200
From: Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2y5y0r72b.wl%randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:16:28PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now.
>
> you may want to review the presentations from last week's apnic meeting
> in busan. real mesurements. sufficiently scary that people who were
> heavily pushing nat444 for the last two years suddenly started to say
> "it was not me who pushed nat444, it was him!" as if none of us had a
> memory.
Hm, I fail to find relevant slides discussing that. Could you please
point us to those?
I'm looking at http://meetings.apnic.net/32
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
