[144266] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Microsoft deems all DigiNotar certificates untrustworthy,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Wed Sep 7 12:35:56 2011
From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:34:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4e67991c.a4c7440a.7735.ffff9b25@mx.google.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1342266.KctPc1tcg3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday 07 Sep 2011 17:17:10 Network IP Dog wrote:
> FYI!!!
>=20
>=20
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoftpri0/2016132391_microsoft_dee
> ms_all_diginotar_certificates_untrust.html
>=20
> Google and Mozilla have also updated their browsers to block all=20
DigiNotar
> certificates, while Apple has been silent on the issue, a emblematic=20
zombie
> response!
>=20
> Cheers.=20
>=20
It would be really nice if the folk at Twitter would fix their images=20
servers (i.e si*.twimg.com) to use a non-evil CA (i.e. not Comodo or=20
DigiNotar or Bubba Gump's Bait, Firearms & Crypto Verification). Not=20
that user pics are a great loss, but if you use=20
Tweetdeck/Seesmic/whatever, the constant SSL cert warnings from dozens-
to-hundreds of user pics are noisy.
This is trivial whining on my part but it is operational.
=2D-=20
The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail=20
to lists complaining about them
--nextPart1342266.KctPc1tcg3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk5nnTsACgkQ0c69vkueJcSWVQCgk48HUPwqptHnaiGbKovXNx8U
TwwAoJBelURkMfE7BW+TrTV9Ze6MEAbJ
=j1Ja
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1342266.KctPc1tcg3--
