[144351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Sep 9 04:45:06 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:44:13 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643BCB14@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>,
"carlos@lacnic.net" <carlos@lacnic.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> When you need to pile up this amount of trickery to make something
>> work, it's probably high time for letting the thing die :-)
> You could say the same thing about NAT44 from the very start!
many of us did
randy
