[143891] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Aug 21 00:15:35 2011
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:14:58 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGSV9Fe5W1RyOKmzrB=2tzkKixcgt7sxpvdPvfWNG=Qy7A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>> o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works)
>> o How much state where
>> o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack)
>> o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features
>> o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)
> - complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...)
good luck with that one
> - overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state"
> question])
> - who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ?
> SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you
> look for the person who will benefit and...
i think of this as 'economic model.' what will change from the current
model?
privacy has also been suggested as an issue.
randy
