[143869] in North American Network Operators' Group
LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Aug 20 16:58:56 2011
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:57:36 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
i am told that the following session has been accepted for the nanog
agenda.
A Comparison of Approaches to Loc/ID, Routing Scaling, and the
Universe
Abstract:
This session looks at and contrasts:
LISP (Dino Farinacci)
ILNP (Saleem Bhatti)
RFC 6296 (Fred Baker)
Where each is explained at an architectural level in some detail
with a predetermined list of questions such as "how does this
address loc/id separation, routing table scaling, incremental
deployment, state of implementation/testing, ..."
And then a half hour where we all sum up the similarities and
differences. Maybe it will be worth writing up.
The goal is education and understanding, not a contest. These are
all good and interesting approaches. Weapons are not allowed, we all
work for the Internet.
as you can see, i am interested in
o loc/id separation
o rounting table scaling
o deployability on the internet
o current state of development
what did i miss? what major attributes interest you?
randy
