[143871] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Sat Aug 20 18:07:36 2011
In-Reply-To: <20110820213719.GA26300@srv03.cluenet.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:06:54 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Daniel Roesen <dr@cluenet.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>> as you can see, i am interested in
>> =A0 o loc/id separation
>> =A0 o rounting table scaling
>> =A0 o deployability on the internet
>> =A0 o current state of development
>>
>> what did i miss? =A0what major attributes interest you?
>
> o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works)
> o How much state where
> o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack)
> o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features
> o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)
>
- complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...)
- overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state" question]=
)
- who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ?
SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you
look for the person who will benefit and...
