[142013] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Hill)
Thu Jun 16 08:44:55 2011
From: Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE003314786405AD79@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:30 +0000, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just
> using IPv6 for this?
I was going to mention this, but it's only the neighbor address that is
IPv6. You still need an IPv4 next-hop and that is where the issue is in
using RFC1918 within this scenario.
Tom
