[142012] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Thu Jun 16 07:30:06 2011
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>, James Grace <james@cs.fiu.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:30:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimjTJPchoY3GyzuEkoYssUMztF+MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
________________________________________
From: Jeff Wheeler [jsw@inconcepts.biz]
>This may sound crazy, and it is certainly not an ideal way of doing
>things; but it is an alternative worth consideration as networks
>exhaust their available IPv4.
I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just using =
IPv6 for this?
--
Leigh Porter
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
______________________________________________________________________
