[142032] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gaurab Raj Upadhaya)
Thu Jun 16 21:33:22 2011
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:33:09 +0100
From: Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4522CE80-08B1-4310-B86F-9CAEA09DCB0E@cs.fiu.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 6/15/11 5:47 PM, James Grace wrote:
> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were
> considering using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any
> horrific consequences to picking up this practice?
This might summarize it nicely.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-04.txt
- -gaurab
- --
http://www.gaurab.org.np/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk36rtUACgkQSo7fU26F3X3WzQCcC0Hv62BTNK111mRs16ISJQ7o
ZfcAn05LoQuFTshG22QYLOmwdLnNm3GY
=vZI7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
