[140475] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu May 12 06:11:37 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCB5091.4050904@kenweb.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 03:06:41 -0700
To: ml@kenweb.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On May 11, 2011, at 8:14 PM, ML wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
>> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 =
companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also =
some of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one =
provider that was full IPv6 ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although =
we don't use them atm.)
>>=20
>=20
> The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I =
get an incomplete IPv6 routing table?
We will happily provide you with a more complete IPv6 routing table, =
though we do, admittedly lack
routes from Cogent and a couple of other players that are having =
difficulty realizing that IPv6 peering
is somewhat different from IPv4.
Owen DeLong
Hurricane Electric
