[140474] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sasa Ristic)
Thu May 12 04:01:44 2011
In-Reply-To: <4DCB5091.4050904@kenweb.org>
From: Sasa Ristic <ristic.sasa@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:00:18 +0200
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:14, ML <ml@kenweb.org> wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
>>
>> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1
>> companies that should have already been full deployed. =C2=A0These are a=
lso some
>> of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. =C2=A0The one provide=
r that
>> was full IPv6 ready was Cogent. =C2=A0HE is also IPv6 (although we don't=
use them
>> atm.)
>>
>
> The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I get a=
n
> incomplete IPv6 routing table?
Hi all,
I can confirm this also, from HE I get 5411 routes on BGPv6, but only
4293 from Cogent... Although, they didn't charge me extra for v6
session...
--=20
Ristic Sasa
VeratNet ISP
Serbia
