[140476] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anthony Francis - Handy Networks L)
Thu May 12 06:15:14 2011
From: Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC <anthony@handynetworks.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:15:09 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BB5E551F-EDC4-420D-805A-C44DC3F085E7@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I can confirm full IPV6 connectivity from HE.
-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:07 AM
To: ml@kenweb.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
On May 11, 2011, at 8:14 PM, ML wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
>> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 com=
panies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of=
the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was=
full IPv6 ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although we don't use them a=
tm.)
>>=20
>=20
> The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I get a=
n incomplete IPv6 routing table?
We will happily provide you with a more complete IPv6 routing table, thoug=
h we do, admittedly lack
routes from Cogent and a couple of other players that are having difficulty=
realizing that IPv6 peering
is somewhat different from IPv4.
Owen DeLong
Hurricane Electric
