[140471] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ML)
Wed May 11 23:14:32 2011
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:14:25 -0400
From: ML <ml@kenweb.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1474311354-1305126222-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-747476740-@bda346.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Reply-To: ml@kenweb.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6 ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although we don't use them atm.)
>
The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I get
an incomplete IPv6 routing table?
