[137927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Feb 22 19:29:37 2011
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:29:25 +0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <D2A2A57F-721E-4F3A-8012-CF80B099FB9E@queuefull.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>> There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
>>> IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
>>> position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
>>> operating production networks.
>>
>> excuse me!
>
> Hi, Randy. I didn't mean to deny you exist; you apparently do. ;) But
> in my sampling, operators
benson,
vendors saying what operators want went *seriously* out of fashion a
couple of years back. we can speak for ourselves, tyvm.
randy
