[137929] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Tue Feb 22 19:51:58 2011
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2vd0bh9ui.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:51:45 -0600
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> There seems to be a position, taken by others on these lists, that
>>>> IPv6 is the only address family that matters. Interestingly, this
>>>> position seems to be most pronounced from people not involved in
>>>> operating production networks.
>>>
>>> excuse me!
>>
>> Hi, Randy. I didn't mean to deny you exist; you apparently do. ;) But
>> in my sampling, operators
>
> benson,
>
> vendors saying what operators want went *seriously* out of fashion a
> couple of years back. we can speak for ourselves, tyvm.
I agree completely. I'm responding to what I've heard from operators.
Cheers,
-Benson
