[137769] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Fri Feb 18 17:32:23 2011
From: "Leigh Porter" <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
In-Reply-To: <480805.6221.qm@web114707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:31:14 +0000
To: "Zed Usser" <zzuser@yahoo.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 18 Feb 2011, at 20:55, "Zed Usser" <zzuser@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Sat, 2/19/11, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>> You only need to solve those problems to the
>> extent that there are meaningful things still
>> trapped in an IPv4-only world.
> Are you willing to bet that IPv4 address exhaustion will not result in IP=
v6-only hosts before we run out of meaningful IPv4-only hosts?
>=20
> - Zed
>=20
IPv6 only hosts are a good thing to speed up v6 adoption. Nothing like a goo=
d carrot to get the donkeys moving.
--=20
Leigh=
