[137775] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6naysayer...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Fri Feb 18 18:32:06 2011
In-Reply-To: <4D5EC38A.4000905@ispalliance.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:31:18 -0700
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: Scott Helms <khelms@ispalliance.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:07, Scott Helms <khelms@ispalliance.net> wrote:
>
> We don't have a situation where the existing infrastructure doesn't work, it does.
It does today. IPv4 addresses are still freely available today though.
As soon as we introduce LSN, the infrastructure starts to stop
working. When that happens, IPv6 will have demand. Hopefully we can
deploy it before then and avoid the brokeness though...
Cheers,
~Chris
> --
> Scott Helms
> Vice President of Technology
> ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
> (678) 507-5000
> --------------------------------
> http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
> --------------------------------
>
--
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org
