[137237] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: My upstream ISP does not support IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (TR Shaw)
Thu Feb 10 06:46:21 2011
From: TR Shaw <tshaw@oitc.com>
In-Reply-To: <018201cbc8e9$3b641120$b22c3360$@iname.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:45:24 -0500
To: frnkblk@iname.com,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean -- once the ISP identifies CPE that works =
on
> their network, couldn't early adopters who are interested in the =
technology
> be pointed to a short list?
>=20
> Frank
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cutler James R [mailto:james.cutler@consultant.com]=20
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 5:00 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: My upstream ISP does not support IPv6
>=20
> All this talk about CPE is wasted until folks like ATT have someone on =
the
> retail interface (store, phone, or, web) who even knows what is this =
"IPv6"
> thing. Exploring this issue with DSL providers and Uverse is like =
that old
> exercise with combat boots. It feels much better when I stop.
Would if att (and others) would support IPv6 (via dedicated, residential =
or even cellular). Where I am, all contact people I have spoken to =
don't have a clue. The best I got was "call back late summer and we'll =
know something) Their residential and cellular folks couldn't even spell =
IPv6.
Tom=
