[136197] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Feb 1 18:02:10 2011
In-Reply-To: <1296595999.16035.6.camel@home>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:01:59 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr> wrote=
:
> Le mardi 01 f=E9vrier 2011 =E0 12:14 -0500, Christopher Morrow a =E9crit =
:
>> countries do not have RIR's, countries have NIR's... regions have RIR's.
>
> In this context, at least, perhaps the NIR should be considered
> superfluous or redundant? What is the operational rationale behind the
> NIR level? Wouldn't a flatter RIR-LIR structure do just fine?
some parts of the world are invested in the NIR ocncept... not my
part, but I do admit other folks like it. (and I didn't want to leave
someone out of the mix)
