[136191] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: quietly....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Barak)
Tue Feb 1 17:43:39 2011
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:43:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <93FDC643-D434-4D3B-9E01-3FE5FB1080F9@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
=0A________________________________=0A=0AFrom: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com=
>=0A=0A=0ADavid Barak=0ANeed Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: =0Ahttp://www.li=
stentothefranchise.com =0A=0A>If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bring=
ing the problems of NAT forward =0A>with you, then, I'm fine with you remai=
ning in your >IPv4 island. I'm willing to =0A>bet that most organizations w=
ill embrace an internet unencumbered by the =0A>brokenness that is NAT and =
>move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has =0A>been a significant b=
arrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be.=0A=0ALack of NAT may or=
may not continue to be a barrier to IPv6 adoption.=A0 However, =0Ait certa=
inly *has* been a barrier to IPv6 adoption - I have had customers tell =0Am=
e that explicitly, and I have no reason to doubt them.=0A=0A=0A
