[136190] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rubens Kuhl)
Tue Feb 1 17:40:33 2011
In-Reply-To: <81B5906E-520D-4A7C-AF19-114DE3F979B4@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:40:29 -0200
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com>
To: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> There is not a single RIR that is not physically located in a country.
> You can hope they are more stable from a policy point of view, but, the
> reality is that if someone shows up at the front door with tanks and
> mortars, my money is not on the RIR.
But they might choose a country in that region that is less likely to
mess with the RIR. For instance, ARIN would probably be a lot safer in
Canada than in the US... RIPE could relocate to Swiss or Sweden
(although I think Holland is not that much of a risk), for instance.
LACNIC in Uruguay seems a good choice to me, the same with AfriNIC in
Mauritius.
Rubens
