[136192] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Tue Feb 1 17:45:55 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <238182428.1509.1296599596109.JavaMail.root@zimbra.network1.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:44:16 +0100
To: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1 feb 2011, at 23:33, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> That's how I would do it. With the exception of LACNIC, each one =
neighbors a block that is already allocated to that RIR.
But if they wanted to do that, why give 106/8 to APNIC?
My suspicion is that IANA is playing a game of battleship with the RIRs =
and thursday we'll see who's won. Colored in for your convenience:
http://www.bgpexpert.com/ianaglobalpool.php=
