[136163] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Feb 1 16:25:30 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D48454A.1090807@brightok.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:23:40 -0800
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 2/1/2011 11:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>=20
>> I prefer persistent GUA over ULA for that.
>>=20
>=20
> I do too, though for simple zeroconf devices, I'd prefer ULA over link =
local. Given that it's not an either or situation, I fully support ULA =
existing.
>=20
>=20
> Jack
Given the vast probability for abuse of ULA becoming de facto GUA later, =
I don't support ULA existing as the benefits are vastly overwhelmed by =
the potential for abouse.
