[136162] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv4's last graph
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Tue Feb 1 16:23:26 2011
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2y65zxy2q.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:17 -0600
To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Cc: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>=20
>> Is there really any value in trying to distribute graphs that will =
all
>> be flat before the end of the year?
>=20
> we're ops, often stick in the mud traditionalists and even somewhat
> supersitious. we've had ipv4 graphs for over 15 years. we like them.
> geoff is mr graph. we like his grphs. heck, you have even used them.
If you're standing near the edge of a cliff, the difference between 1 =
inch and 6 inches is significant. Vendors are watching from the =
distance, saying "he's at the edge of the cliff!". But to the guy =
standing there, it matters.
Plus, I like graphs.
Cheers,
-Benson
