[134037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Wheeler)
Wed Dec 22 03:13:21 2010
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1012220921450.16803@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:13:14 -0500
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote:
> 'Maximum Prefix Length' may be an over-simplifying metric. FWIW, we're
> certainly not a major transit provider, but we do allow /48 in the
> designated PI ranges but not in the PA ranges. =A0So the question is not
> necessarily just about the prefix length used because it might vary by th=
e
> prefix.
I know it is an over-simplification. If someone wishes to edit the
page to provide more specific details about the route filtering policy
for a given transit network, Wikipedia is pretty easy to edit.
Hopefully they would provide a citation/link to the policy page for
the NSP as well.
--=20
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
Sr Network Operator=A0 /=A0 Innovative Network Concepts
