[134036] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pekka Savola)
Wed Dec 22 02:25:26 2010
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:24:12 +0200 (EET)
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin8LbfH6UkXKD1x5gxrZOVLJ+hSgOXx7Q5Tyb6Z@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IPv6_support_by_major_transit_providers
'Maximum Prefix Length' may be an over-simplifying metric. FWIW, we're
certainly not a major transit provider, but we do allow /48 in the
designated PI ranges but not in the PA ranges. So the question is not
necessarily just about the prefix length used because it might vary by
the prefix.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
