[134048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Dec 22 11:12:26 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1012221355250.23446@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:11:01 -0800
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>=20
>> I would really love to see weekly Routing Reports for IPv6 as we have
>> them for legacy IP rather sooner than later.
>=20
> This would provide statistics and might be useful from historical POV, =
but I fear the operational impact of published IPv4 Routing Table =
reports is close to zero. (E.g. 'does it help in making people stop =
advertising unnecessary more-specific routes?'.) I don't expect that to =
change.
Today, probably not much. In the past when it started, yes, a great =
deal.
Owen
