[132311] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Fri Nov 19 18:34:01 2010
To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:07:53 -0800."
<4CE6D919.2000604@mompl.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:33:35 +1100
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <4CE6D919.2000604@mompl.net>, Jeroen van Aart writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4. Easier to
> > debug failures.
>
> Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and
> IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this
> is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.
>
> Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?
I've been using HE for 7 years now and have always got a fast response
when I've had problems with the link.
> Thanks,
> Jeroen
>
> --
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
>
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
