[132299] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Fri Nov 19 15:08:13 2010
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:07:53 -0800
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101119010649.3A8CF6EB86C@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-Assp-Envelope-From: jeroen@mompl.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mark Andrews wrote:
> Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4. Easier to
> debug failures.
Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and
IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this
is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.
Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
