[132301] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Franck Martin)
Fri Nov 19 15:36:39 2010
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: franck@genius.com
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:36:28 +1300 (FJST)
From: Franck Martin <franck@genius.com>
To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CE6D919.2000604@mompl.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I use HE.NET in a few installations (with BGP) and they have good support (which is quite awesome for a free service).
As people pointed out avoid 6to4, Apple just rendered it nearly useless in its latest OS-X.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeroen van Aart" <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2010 9:07:53 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
Mark Andrews wrote:
> Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4. Easier to
> debug failures.
Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and
IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this
is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.
Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?
Thanks,
Jeroen
