[132226] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Nov 18 14:38:29 2010
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:38:17 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik7ZQqbTYbX+STdtWVhZwrJc+Ma0c5H9gS6+02k@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Pricing hasn't been an issue when I've dealt with them. It's been more
of a "Have your account manager issue the order so we can make the
appropriate changes." which is just a business process and not unexpected.
Only reason I don't have v6 on Qwest is that I'm connected to a Juniper
and I didn't want to be moved to a Cisco to support it. When they
support v6 to customers on the Juniper, I will have the paperwork done.
Jack
On 11/18/2010 1:06 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> Hiya folks,
>
> Why are your respective companies treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales
> matter instead of a standard technical change request like IP
> addresses or BGP? Sprint and Qwest, I know you're guilty. How many of
> the rest of you are making IPv6 installation harder for your customers
> than it needs to be?
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
