[132227] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Cisco 6500 QoS Priority Queuing (DSCP & EXP based)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rampley Jr, Jim F)
Thu Nov 18 14:40:30 2010

From: "Rampley Jr, Jim F" <jim.rampley@chartercom.com>
To: Chris Evans <chrisccnpspam2@gmail.com>, Manu Chao <linux.yahoo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:40:04 -0600
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinT-H2ZCbgarxd_d9_1i6iNoZ6kWDWOpvUbH=82@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

As it relates directly to QoS on 6700 series cards, yes those blades do COS=
 based QoS.  So if you want to put voice traffic in a priority queue you wo=
uld do something like this:

! map COS 5 to the priority queue, assuming you want COS 5 in the priority =
queue
priority-queue cos-map 1 5
! Set the queue limit to the size you want
priority-queue queue-limit 10

Jim


From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpspam2@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:59 AM
To: Manu Chao
Cc: NANOG list; Rampley Jr, Jim F
Subject: Re: Cisco 6500 QoS Priority Queuing (DSCP & EXP based)


These are lan modules. They have fixed queues that you map traffic into.  R=
esearch lan qos methods and it should make sense.
On Nov 17, 2010 11:55 AM, "Manu Chao" <linux.yahoo@gmail.com<mailto:linux.y=
ahoo@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Jim,
>
> The line cards are 6700 series only.
>
> It seems (i will test it) that wrr commands can only be associated with C=
OS
> marking not DSCP nor EXP.
>
> May be Priority Queuing is not supported for MPLS traffic on 6700 modules=
 ?
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Rampley Jr, Jim F <
> jim.rampley@chartercom.com<mailto:jim.rampley@chartercom.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> This depends on which line cards you have in your chassis. This
>> configuration below won't work on 6700 series line cards. You have to use
>> the wrr commands. I didn't test it, but MQC configuration below should w=
ork
>> on ES series line cards.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Manu Chao [mailto:linux.yahoo@gmail.com<mailto:linux.yahoo@gmail.c=
om>]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:11 AM
>> To: NANOG list
>> Subject: Cisco 6500 QoS Priority Queuing (DSCP & EXP based)
>>
>> I would to translate following 7200 QoS configuration to Catalyst 6500:
>>
>> class-map match-any PQ
>> match dscp ef
>> match mpls experimental topmost 5
>>
>> policy-map QOS-PE-OUT
>> class PQ
>> priority percent 33
>> class class-default
>>
>> AFAIK we need extra command on 6500 to enable Priority Queuing at the
>> interface level but my problem is that interface priority command are on=
ly
>> COS based not DSCP nor EXP. I may be wrong.
>>
>> I would appreciate any 6500 QoS help.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The contents of this e-mail message and
>> any attachments are intended solely for the
>> addressee(s) and may contain confidential
>> and/or legally privileged information. If you
>> are not the intended recipient of this message
>> or if this message has been addressed to you
>> in error, please immediately alert the sender
>> by reply e-mail and then delete this message
>> and any attachments. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are notified that
>> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,
>> or storage of this message or any attachment
>> is strictly prohibited.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:=20

=20

=20

=20

The contents of this e-mail message and=20
any attachments are intended solely for the=20
addressee(s) and may contain confidential=20
and/or legally privileged information. If you=20
are not the intended recipient of this message=20
or if this message has been addressed to you=20
in error, please immediately alert the sender
 by reply e-mail and then delete this message=20
and any attachments. If you are not the=20
intended recipient, you are notified that=20
any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,=20
or storage of this message or any attachment=20
is strictly prohibited.








home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post