[132232] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan Finnesey)
Thu Nov 18 17:11:04 2010
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:10:56 -0800
In-Reply-To: <4CE57A97.10303@rollernet.us>
From: "Ryan Finnesey" <ryan.finnesey@HarrierInvestments.com>
To: "Seth Mattinen" <sethm@rollernet.us>,
"nanog group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sprint keeps telling us they do not yet support IPv6. Is this not the
case?
-----Original Message-----
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm@rollernet.us]=20
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:12 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales
matter?
On 11/18/2010 11:06, William Herrin wrote:
> Hiya folks,
>=20
> Why are your respective companies treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales=20
> matter instead of a standard technical change request like IP=20
> addresses or BGP? Sprint and Qwest, I know you're guilty. How many of=20
> the rest of you are making IPv6 installation harder for your customers
> than it needs to be?
>=20
My IPv6 dealings with Sprint have been purely technical from all
aspects. If you were to ask about, say, Verizon; well, check the
archives for my failed experience. =3D)
~Seth
