[132219] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: experience with equinix exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Horstman)
Thu Nov 18 14:01:55 2010
From: Justin Horstman <justin.horstman@gorillanation.com>
To: 'Paul WALL' <pauldotwall@gmail.com>, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:01:45 -0800
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJTMp1isn5LU5VS57wHdcLs3LJ-yzQ7yU0b8_o@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
8 users
9 politics and policies
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotwall@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM
> To: Mehmet Akcin
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange
>=20
> What are the layer 8-9 issues?
>=20
> Drive Slow,
> Paul Wall
>=20
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at
> any of
> >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
> people
> >> really love or hate it.
> >>
> >> -shac
> >
> >
> > Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and
> layer9 seem the lacking part
> > which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they
> seem to be the largest IX
> >
> > per
> >
> >
> https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=3D5&peerParticipan
> tsPublicsOrder=3DSorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=3DDESC
> >
> > so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they
> are reliable.
> >
> > mehmet
> >
