[132218] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: experience with equinix exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul WALL)
Thu Nov 18 13:58:19 2010
In-Reply-To: <93406D7D-81DA-419A-B83B-9EA8139DEFF9@akcin.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:55:18 -0500
From: Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
To: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
What are the layer 8-9 issues?
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
>
>> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any of
>> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if people
>> really love or hate it.
>>
>> -shac
>
>
> Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9 seem the lacking part
> which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seem to be the largest IX
>
> per
>
> https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipantsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
>
> so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they are reliable.
>
> mehmet
>
