[132220] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: experience with equinix exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Miller)
Thu Nov 18 14:03:57 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJTMp1isn5LU5VS57wHdcLs3LJ-yzQ7yU0b8_o@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steve Miller <stmille@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:01:39 -0800
To: Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
Cc: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
politics, finance...
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com> wrote:
> What are the layer 8-9 issues?
>
> Drive Slow,
> Paul Wall
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any
> of
> >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
> people
> >> really love or hate it.
> >>
> >> -shac
> >
> >
> > Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9
> seem the lacking part
> > which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seem
> to be the largest IX
> >
> > per
> >
> >
> https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipantsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
> >
> > so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they are
> reliable.
> >
> > mehmet
> >
>
>
