[131150] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Unique_local_addres?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Wed Oct 20 21:51:52 2010
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:49:54 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <585A7AD9-E6D6-4477-B8DC-4A09539F0EB9@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: matthew@matthew.at
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/20/2010 5:51 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Part 2 will be when the first provider accepts a large sum of money to
> route it within their public network between multiple sites owned by
> the same customer.
Is this happening now with RFC 1918 addresses and IPv4?
> Part 3 will be when that same provider (or some other provider in the
> same boat) takes the next step and starts trading routes of ULA space
> with other provider(s).
Is this happening now with RFC 1918 addresses and IPv4?
If not, do you predict that it will soon, and if so, why?
Matthew Kaufman
